Will need to e-cigarettes be allowed on jets?
Since their summary of north america in 2006, electric cigarette have been marketed as smoking-cessation tools.
That's controversial, as so little is understood about electric cigarettes -- which build a nicotine-infused vapor as an alternative to cigarettes -- and their potential effects on people's health. It's possible that inhaling the vapor is way better for your health than inhaling cigarettes and the the mere handling on the cigarette-shaped device may help smokers lessen their dependence on real cigarettes.
On the flip side, that vapor may just be damaging to people, delivering nicotine in a very harmful way, and e-cigarettes may just be a gateway to real cigarettes.
Portion of the reason do not are aware of the answers is the fact these e-smokes are relatively new on the country therefore not well studied. Plus, the us govenment hasn't quite worked out tips on how to regulate e-smokes, leaving manufacturers relatively free to say what they desire about them.
Because report notes, the controversy has taken a different turn as individuals have begun using electric cigarette starter kit
on airplanes -- and posting videos of themselves from the act.
The U.S. Department of transportation says that was not allowed and apparently offers to impose a ban around the devices' use on airplanes this spring.
But should it be?
One danger that real cigarettes pose but e-cigs don't would be the threat of starting a fireplace. And even though smoke is likely to gather in a enclosed space before air is thick, it isn't clear the fact that vapor from e-cigarettes creates identical foggy effect.
I sympathize with those who get nervous after they fly; I imagine that using an e-cigarette might help calm them down. Whether I wish to be sitting close to those "smoking" you are an alternative question.
What is your opinion? Should e-cigarettes be permitted on U.S. airplanes, because they are on some European airlines? Or whenever they, like real cigarettes, be barred through the cabin?
That's controversial, as so little is understood about electric cigarettes -- which build a nicotine-infused vapor as an alternative to cigarettes -- and their potential effects on people's health. It's possible that inhaling the vapor is way better for your health than inhaling cigarettes and the the mere handling on the cigarette-shaped device may help smokers lessen their dependence on real cigarettes.
On the flip side, that vapor may just be damaging to people, delivering nicotine in a very harmful way, and e-cigarettes may just be a gateway to real cigarettes.
Portion of the reason do not are aware of the answers is the fact these e-smokes are relatively new on the country therefore not well studied. Plus, the us govenment hasn't quite worked out tips on how to regulate e-smokes, leaving manufacturers relatively free to say what they desire about them.
Because report notes, the controversy has taken a different turn as individuals have begun using electric cigarette starter kit
on airplanes -- and posting videos of themselves from the act.
The U.S. Department of transportation says that was not allowed and apparently offers to impose a ban around the devices' use on airplanes this spring.
But should it be?
One danger that real cigarettes pose but e-cigs don't would be the threat of starting a fireplace. And even though smoke is likely to gather in a enclosed space before air is thick, it isn't clear the fact that vapor from e-cigarettes creates identical foggy effect.
I sympathize with those who get nervous after they fly; I imagine that using an e-cigarette might help calm them down. Whether I wish to be sitting close to those "smoking" you are an alternative question.
What is your opinion? Should e-cigarettes be permitted on U.S. airplanes, because they are on some European airlines? Or whenever they, like real cigarettes, be barred through the cabin?
babala6547 - 1. Mär, 07:31
