Studies: E-Cigarettes Well-liked, May perhaps be Able at Supporting Those that smoke Terminate
A brand new study from Boston University shows that electric cigarettes (e cigarette starter kit ) might be more appropriate at helping smokers quit than nicotine patches or gum, TIME magazine reported Feb. 10.
The researchers, led by Michael Siegel, M.D., sent surveys to 5,000 first-time buyers of e-cigarettes over two weeks last year. The response rate was low (4.5 percent), or 222, as outlined by a summary published from the Boston University School of Public Health. Respondents were primarily older males who had attempted to give up smoking more often than not in the past.
Nearly 67 percent with the respondents reported that they reduce cigarettes few months after beginning use of e-cigarettes, and 34.3 % said these were not using e-cigarettes or another cessation aids that contained nicotine. Other research has revealed that around 12 to 18 percent with people who used nicotine patches and nicotine gum report abstinence at few months -- nearly half the rate of those that used e-cigarettes within this survey.
"This study suggests that e-cigarettes are helping many ex-smokers remain off cigarettes," Siegel said.
The authors with the study acknowledged how the study's conclusions were restricted to time frame response rate, pointing out that smokers who had quit or decrease smoking may be quite likely going to respond. However, the course notes said it was the most beneficial evidence up to now about the effectiveness of e-cigarettes, knowning that the devices "hold promise as being a smoking-cessation method and they are worthy of further study using more rigorous research designs."
TIME stated that more then one earlier study had figured that electronic cigarette starter kit were ineffective at helping smokers quit. Several states are thinking about prohibiting their use.
"Banning this device would invariably lead to many ex-smokers returning to using tobacco," Siegel said. "Removing e cigs from your market would substantially harm the public's health."
Meanwhile, the second study of e-cigarettes with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health reviewed internet searches for smoking alternatives between January 2008 and September 2010 and found that e cig starter kit had become a great deal more popular than creative options, at the least in the us as well as U.K.
"Neither of such two studies provides scientific evidence that e-cigarettes are impressive in aiding individuals quit," said professor John Pierce in the Moores Cancer Center on the University of California, San Diego. "It's uncertain if you ask me that e-cigarettes aren't harmful for some reason. It's actually not clear for the FDA, either."
Both studies appeared online Feb. 8, 2011 from the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. The Boston University study, led by Michael B. Siegel, was titled, "Electronic Cigarettes Like a Smoking-Cessation Tool: Is a result of a web based Survey" (PDF). Case study for the use of e-cigarettes conducted by John W. Ayers and the team, was titled, "Tracking the increase in Availability of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems ('Electronic Cigarettes') Using Search Query Surveillance" (PDF).
The researchers, led by Michael Siegel, M.D., sent surveys to 5,000 first-time buyers of e-cigarettes over two weeks last year. The response rate was low (4.5 percent), or 222, as outlined by a summary published from the Boston University School of Public Health. Respondents were primarily older males who had attempted to give up smoking more often than not in the past.
Nearly 67 percent with the respondents reported that they reduce cigarettes few months after beginning use of e-cigarettes, and 34.3 % said these were not using e-cigarettes or another cessation aids that contained nicotine. Other research has revealed that around 12 to 18 percent with people who used nicotine patches and nicotine gum report abstinence at few months -- nearly half the rate of those that used e-cigarettes within this survey.
"This study suggests that e-cigarettes are helping many ex-smokers remain off cigarettes," Siegel said.
The authors with the study acknowledged how the study's conclusions were restricted to time frame response rate, pointing out that smokers who had quit or decrease smoking may be quite likely going to respond. However, the course notes said it was the most beneficial evidence up to now about the effectiveness of e-cigarettes, knowning that the devices "hold promise as being a smoking-cessation method and they are worthy of further study using more rigorous research designs."
TIME stated that more then one earlier study had figured that electronic cigarette starter kit were ineffective at helping smokers quit. Several states are thinking about prohibiting their use.
"Banning this device would invariably lead to many ex-smokers returning to using tobacco," Siegel said. "Removing e cigs from your market would substantially harm the public's health."
Meanwhile, the second study of e-cigarettes with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health reviewed internet searches for smoking alternatives between January 2008 and September 2010 and found that e cig starter kit had become a great deal more popular than creative options, at the least in the us as well as U.K.
"Neither of such two studies provides scientific evidence that e-cigarettes are impressive in aiding individuals quit," said professor John Pierce in the Moores Cancer Center on the University of California, San Diego. "It's uncertain if you ask me that e-cigarettes aren't harmful for some reason. It's actually not clear for the FDA, either."
Both studies appeared online Feb. 8, 2011 from the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. The Boston University study, led by Michael B. Siegel, was titled, "Electronic Cigarettes Like a Smoking-Cessation Tool: Is a result of a web based Survey" (PDF). Case study for the use of e-cigarettes conducted by John W. Ayers and the team, was titled, "Tracking the increase in Availability of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems ('Electronic Cigarettes') Using Search Query Surveillance" (PDF).
babala6547 - 16. Feb, 04:34
